<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Writing on Dan Kleiman</title><link>http://dankleiman.com/tags/writing/</link><description>Recent content in Writing on Dan Kleiman</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.156.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://dankleiman.com/tags/writing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Inline Comments Suck for Doc Review</title><link>http://dankleiman.com/code/inline-comments-suck-for-doc-review/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://dankleiman.com/code/inline-comments-suck-for-doc-review/</guid><description>Comment threads on a design doc create a false sense of progress. Real design review means treating comments as signals to synthesize into decisions, not a checklist to clear one thread at a time.</description></item></channel></rss>